SEOlytics GmbH Logo

SEOlytics GmbH

Hamburg

Head of Development at SEOlytics

Head of Development

May 2015 - March 2016
11 months
Full-time
Product work
Hamburg

Relevance

Why this case matters

This framing makes the decision signal explicit: impact, proof, fit, and AI / delivery relevance for hiring or collaboration.

System impact

Led the development organization, microservices architecture, and internal engineering systems such as Jira, Wiki, Jenkins, Git, Quay.io, and Nexus closer to product delivery.

AI / delivery relevance

AI-native systems craft needs clear technical direction and teams that connect architecture, product, and execution. This case shows that leadership work before today's AI hype.

Head of DevelopmentMicroservicesTeam BuildingProduct Development

Proof

Internal + external

Developers led

Microservices

Architecture shift

Hiring

Team building

Toolchain

Engineering enablement

Especially relevant for

  • For companies that do not want to separate technical leadership from product and delivery responsibility.
  • For teams that need to evolve existing systems without disconnecting delivery.

Case context

Overview

SEOlytics was moving an existing software system toward microservices while the development organization also needed clearer leadership. I took professional and disciplinary responsibility for internal and external developers and connected technical direction with product development.

The transformation connected microservice architecture, team building, employee development, internal engineering systems, and operational steerability. Jira, Wiki, SVN, Jenkins, Git, Quay.io, and Nexus were not just tools, but part of whether developers could reliably find, build, test, deploy, and understand work.

Responsibility

Activities

  • Team Leadership: Professional and disciplinary leadership of internal/external software developers
  • Architecture Transformation: Microservices architecture, system restructuring, scalable software architecture
  • Product Development: Technical responsibility for product development, maintenance, and enhancement
  • Team Building: Team restructuring, job postings, interviews, employee development
  • Strategic IT: Resource planning, strategic IT alignment, internal software and tool development
  • Engineering enablement: Shared responsibility for Jira, Wiki, SVN, Jenkins, Git, Quay.io, and Nexus as internal development infrastructure
  • Quality Assurance: Timeline and quality standards, lean development, code review

Operating mode

Methodology

  • Servant Leadership: Team Empowerment, Shared Ownership, Collaborative Decision Making
  • Delivery system: Use Scrum and lean development to improve transparency, feedback, and decision speed
  • Technical quality: Pair programming, code review, refactoring, and quality standards as shared team responsibility
  • Cloud Computing: Scalable Architecture, Modern Infrastructure, DevOps Practices

Technical context

Technology stack

The tools are not the point by themselves. What matters is which system layers had to work together.

5Areas
18Technologies

Backend

2
JavaMicroservices

DevOps

3
Cloud ComputingDockerGit

CI/CD & Delivery Pipelines

4
JenkinsCI/CD PipelineNexusQuay.io

Tools

2
JiraConfluence

Practices

7
Project ManagementTeam CollaborationSCRUMLean DevelopmentAgile CoachingDocumentationProcess Tracking

Next step

If you want to explore similar leverage for hiring, collaboration, or a concrete transformation, this is the right starting point.

Send a short note about the situation you are trying to assess. I reply personally and will be direct about fit.